With the exception of the agricultural sector, Iowa’s economy is doing very well as evidenced by an extremely low unemployment rate of 2.6%. The stock market is booming due to increasing corporate profits, yet Iowa employees’ wages and salaries are stagnant. Factoring in inflation, Iowans are seeing their net wage increases consumed. Iowans at the lowest income levels are actually seeing a decline in their incomes due to inflation.

Both the Republican federal and state tax cuts are benefiting the rich and corporations, but for the majority of Americans the GOP promises have failed miserably. Republicans are boasting about the great economy, but most Americans are getting left behind. Many economists predicted that the GOP tax cuts for top income earners would never “trickle down” to benefit most Americans.

A new study from United Way of Iowa suggests income insecurity is getting worse. “The organization’s 2018 ALICE report shows 457,044 households, 37 percent of the state’s total, can’t afford the basic costs of living.  ALICE stands for Asset-Limited, Income-Constrained, Employed.”

How can this be? Traditional supply and demand economic theory predicts when demand for workers is high and the supply of workers is low it forces employers to raise wages to increase and maintain their workforce.

However, there is a growing disconnect between the critical demand for workers and the willingness of employers to offer corresponding wage increases.

A recent Forbes article summed up this disconnect between high labor demand and low wages as, “labor lost and capital won.”  They offer several reasons for the worker income stagnation in a booming economy.

First, labor’s bargaining power falls as unions weaken. Between 1979 and 2013, private sector union membership fell from about 34 percent to 10 percent. The Republican Party’s corporate-dominated, anti-union movement has successfully reduced union revenue, making it harder to organize and demand higher wages. The Supreme Court, in Janus v AFSCME, voted 5 to 4 against the interests of public sector unions as well. Unions also play a pivotal role in helping to pass increases in minimum wage laws.

The Iowa Republican legislature could be the poster boy for attacks on unions. They terminated the Democrats passage of minimum wage increases in four Iowa counties and gutted the public union’s bargaining rights. Governor Reynolds signed the legislation.

Second, workers fear job insecurity. There isn’t any hope of a future of 40 years and a gold watch with companies today. A very low unemployment rate doesn’t give workers any security from layoff.

Third, corporate giants are accumulating greater market power. Consumers may benefit with lower prices, but employees aren’t rewarded with higher wages. Productivity has been running ahead of wages, which puts little pressure on prices but boosts corporate profits.

The Iowa Policy Project (IPP) has a newly released study called “A Roadmap for Opportunity.” The first in the series is, “promoting economic security for Iowa workers.”

“I think in Iowa and nationally the big story of the last 18 months is that the economy is booming without bringing up wages,” said Colin Gordon, a senior research consultant at the Iowa Policy Project.

“That’s especially true in Iowa, where we’ve got an unemployment rate that’s hovering below 3 percent, but it doesn’t seem to be giving workers much bargaining power with wages.”

The IPP study points to many of the same causes as the Forbes article.

“Iowa leaders have started turning their backs on the state’s long and important role to enhance and protect the economic security of Iowa’s workers. The state sets a minimum wage level, enforces wages and hours laws, manages a system to compensate injured workers, and establishes ground rules for collective bargaining by public and private sector workers. Lawmakers in recent years have seriously weakened these.”

The IPP’s summary suggests electing a governor and legislators committed to the goal of restoring the economic security of Iowa workers.

The 2018 midterm elections provide a sharp contrast. (1) A choice between more of the same anti-worker trickle down voodoo economics under Republican domination; or (2) a sharp forward push by electing Democratic leaders committed to a pro-worker, pro-union agenda with fair tax proposals that will result in rising wages and salaries for all Iowans.

 

by Rick Smith
Posted 9/14/18

2 thoughts on “The Best Choice In This Election Will Give Iowans A Raise

  1. We need to change the narrative on what economic growth is. The way it stands, we hear things like, “wages aren’t going up, but at least we all benefit because the economy is growing.”

    That’s nonsense. Just look at how they measure growth. They don’t count up everything produced and put a market value on it, which is the intention. That’s impossible, so they count income as a reasonable substitute for production. This means that when they say “the economy grew”, what they are really saying is that total income went up.

    So, if total income goes up, but wages do not, what can you imply from that? Certainly not that everyone benefits from a higher GDP. You can’t even imply that it will somehow “trickle down” in the future. GDP by itself is not a leading economic indicator. It is simply a measure of the past period’s income.

    It helps to keep things in perspective and remember definitions of terms.

    GDP also measures total expenditures, but that’s just because income for one is a cost for someone else.

  2. With unemployment that low, we should see a booming consumer economy and an “employees’ market.” We are seeing neither. Our buying power is still eroding, while corporations are growing flush with cash – that they h=then turn around and invest in stock buy-backs, and bonuses for the CEO’s and dividends (not as large as they actually SHOULD be) for stockholders.
    It is unsustainable. When everyone must buy from the company store, real growth can’t take place, and eventually, the company will find it can’t eat greenbacks. When there is no middle class, there is no sustaining economic engine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *