It’s Worker Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2024.

Yesterday, Vice President Kamala Harris picked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate—arguably a progressive pick, given the laws Walz has signed as governor that have propelled Minnesota into an escape state for many of Iowa’s more liberal-minded folks.

 

But picking Walz also signals something else: Workers, and pro-worker policies, are back at the forefront of Democratic politics.

 

Walz, a former teacher and union member, said it himself in a speech to building trades unions: 

 

“In my first campaign for Congress, in a debate, my opponent came at me and said, ‘Tim is in the pocket of organized labor,’” Walz said. “And I said, ‘That is a damn lie. I *am* the pocket.’”

How pro-worker is Tim Walz?

• Labor journalist Steven Greenhouse notes Walz helped enact “one of the most pro-worker packages of legislation that any US state has passed in decades.”
• That legislation, which was signed into law last year, mandates paid sick days, bans noncompete agreements, boosts funding for workplace safety inspectors, and increases protections for workers in nursing homes, Amazon warehouses, meatpacking plants, construction sites, hospitals and public schools.

• It has paid dividends for low-paid workers, like a $23.49/hour minimum wage by 2027 for nursing home workers.

• It also provided for a loan forgiveness program for nurses, and put strict rules on hospital mergers.

• Walz signed an executive order banning bachelor’s degree requirements for the majority of state jobs.

• And he helped negotiate better pay for Uber and Lyft drivers, even despite those companies threatening to leave the state.

What do you think of the pick? I’ll run your responses in Friday’s newsletter.

In my never-ending quest to get better at my job, I’ve been reading and watching labor/working-class stuff. So I thought I’d occasionally share what I’ve learned!

 

“No Longer Newsworthy” was actually written by a former professor of mine at the University of Northern Iowa, Dr. Chris Martin, who is also one of the heads of the faculty union there.

 

It’s about how journalists used to center the working class, and workers themselves, in their coverage. And then, around the 1960s, the news business began catering to an “upscale” audience to attract advertisers, shifted to talking about “business” and “money,” and centering things like workplace etiquette, rather than how to take power back through unions. This accelerated with the “trickle down” policies of Reagan, et al, in the 1970s and 80s (and, let’s be real, continued through the 90s).

 

Not only did that mean workers were not seeing themselves represented in news stories, they were taught that all their problems were individual personal failings. And Martin directly traces that to the rise of conservative news and strongman political figures like Trump.

 

But it doesn’t have to be this way—and it starts with us journos realizing that objectivity is a false god that both-sides its way into irrelevancy:

 

“Should journalism follow wherever our current politics takes us?” he asks. “Or should it set its own agenda, putting its historically democratic function—loyalty to all citizens—first?”

 

I know what I’m picking: Power to the people!

You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.