Iowa Republicans celebrated while Iowa Democrats lamented after the Iowa Supreme Court allowed the state’s six-week abortion ban to take effect on Friday.
Depending on their party affiliation and belief in bodily autonomy, Iowa elected officials had varying reactions to the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision to dissolve the 2023 injunction that blocked a near-total abortion ban in the state. The 4-3 decision took immediate effect Friday and bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy—before most know they’re pregnant in the first place.
To learn more about the breaking news, staff writer Nikoel Hytrek has got you covered. Want to know how your elected officials are reacting? Continue reading to see how Republicans and Democrats are feeling after the morning ruling.
Republicans quick to celebrate
Gov. Kim Reynolds applauded the court’s ruling that will make the near-total abortion ban she has championed take effect. Reynolds viewed the ruling as a long time coming since she signed a similar bill in 2018.
“As the heartbeat bill finally becomes law, we are deeply committed to supporting women in planning for motherhood, and promoting fatherhood and its importance in parenting,” Reynolds stated. “We will continue to develop policies that encourage strong families, which includes promoting adoption and protecting in vitro fertilization (IVF).”
Reynolds’s point to protect IVF comes after growing concern amongst Republican governors that IVF — a fertility treatment that puts sperm and egg together in a dish — are babies that should be protected.
Iowa Senate Majority Leader Jack Whitver (R-Grimes) called the ruling a step in the right direction, commending the Supreme Court for the “clarity” they provided on the issue.
“I am optimistic the common-sense law passed again last year to protect life at the sound of a heartbeat with exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother will be found constitutional,” he stated.
Iowa House Speaker Pat Grassley called the ruling a victory.
“For too long, the courts have stood in the way of Iowans having their voices heard on this matter,” he stated. “ We are a pro-life and pro-family state.
Grassley falsely stated that “out-of-touch, far-left” political groups fight for abortion “up until the day of birth” and promised he would fight for common sense policies to protect life.
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird touted herself as a defender of Iowa’s heartbeat law to protect the unborn.
“While today’s decision is a landmark victory, we know there is work left to be done,” she stated. “We will keep working to support Iowa families, parents, and the unborn as the fight for life continues.”
Democrats fear for women’s safety, outcomes of the ruling
Iowa House Democratic Leader Jennifer Konfrst of Windsor Heights called the ruling devastating.
“Iowa Republicans have just gone too far,” Konfrost said in a statement. “They are out of touch with the majority of Iowans who want reproductive freedom. Politicians and judges have no place interfering in someone else’s decisions about when to start a family.”
Konfrst called on Iowans to hold their elected officials accountable to protect women across the state.
“Everyone deserves the right to make their own healthcare decisions, especially when it comes to reproductive care and abortion,” she said. “Iowa Democrats will put people over politics and keep fighting every single day to save our reproductive freedom in Iowa.”
Iowa Sen. Sarah Trone-Garriott (D-West Des Moines) called Iowa Republicans obsessive in a statement that called the Hawkeye State a “reproductive healthcare desert” that will endanger lives.
“Reynolds and other extreme, anti-choice Republicans passed this abortion ban in an unprecedented special session after a nearly identical version was struck down by these very courts,” she recalled. “Today’s decision to uphold this ban puts lives in danger, plain and simple. This decision will only make things worse,” Trone-Garriott said.
Iowans do not support these policies, she said, promising to continue the fight to restore reproductive freedom for generations to come.
In her own statement, Iowa Senate Democratic Leader Pam Jochum of Dubuque said June 28 will be remembered as a tragic day in history, one initiated by an “activist court” and extremists.
“This ruling is also a warning for Iowa’s future,” Jochum said, urging Iowans to vote blue in November. “If extreme Republicans and activist judges are willing to reject clear public sentiment to undermine longstanding rights, then no other freedoms are secure either. What rights will they come for next?”
Fact-checking Trump’s lies on abortion during the presidential debate
Trump spent much of Tuesday’s debate lying about his position on abortion, repeatedly spreading conspiracy theories about Democrats executing...
Providing abortion for people who have to flee their states
An Illinois abortion provider has years of experience treating people who are forced to leave their homes to get abortions. With Iowa’s near-total...
Zach Nunn dodges question about his abortion record
At a press conference, US Rep. Zach Nunn avoided answering a question about his abortion record in Iowa and how it connects to the near-total ban...
Case against Iowa abortion ban dropped, IA Supreme Court makes success unlikely
Because of an Iowa Supreme Court ruling from June, it's unlikely the case against Iowa's near-total abortion ban would succeed. The lawsuit...
Access to birth control in Iowa is down. Here’s why it matters
Studies show Iowans aren't getting birth control because they don't have access to a clinic and/or it's too expensive. That's not good for people's...
VIDEOS: Iowa abortion ban’s path to enaction
During the special legislative session in which Iowa lawmakers passed a near-total abortion ban, Iowans plead for their lives in urging lawmakers to...