Iowa Legislature Takes Aim At Racial Justice Protests

After a summer filled with public activism on racial justice issues following George Floyd’s murder, an Iowa Senate subcommittee on Tuesday advanced a wide-ranging law enforcement protections bill meant to clamp down on future protests.

“I think we all know that over the past several months, law enforcement here in Iowa and around the country have been subjected to some unusually difficult circumstances. This is a bill to try to extend protections to our law enforcement,” Sen. Julian Garrett said on a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, with Republican Sen. Dave Dawson and Democratic Sen. Kevin Kinney. The legislation advanced 3-0.

The bill increases penalties for riots, harassment, disorderly conduct and assaults, allows law enforcement to sue if they’ve been injured, provides immunity from civil liability for drivers of vehicles who in some circumstances injure someone unlawfully blocking traffic and provides for a holding period of 24 hours if a person is arrested rioting, among other provisions.

The legislation comes after thousands across Iowa protested George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin. Chauvin will be on trial next week in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

“I particularly appreciate some of the rioting provisions in here from what we saw across the state this last summer,” said Dawson. “I think this is a good bill.”

Kinney said he supported the bill without any further remarks.

Keenan Crow, the director of policy and advocacy at the LGBTQ advocacy group One Iowa, questioned the legislation’s fairness. Crow joined the protests over the summer.

“Put yourself in the position of one of these protesters. They show up to a demonstration because they care deeply about their community and they want to make a difference, and in the midst of their march they’re hit with a vehicle and incur serious injuries … and are racking up medical expenses. How are they going to recover such expenses? Under such proposal, they’re just out of luck?” Crow said.

“Their primary crime here is caring enough to speak out on something that they care about, and we’re going to tell them they can’t recover reasonable damages from someone who failed to maintain control of their vehicle? That doesn’t seem fair to me.”

Much of the bill is based on the Governor’s policing proposal, Garrett noted. Gov. Kim Reynolds proposed a criminal justice bill in early February that combines her police officer accountability law with additional law enforcement protections.

“We’re also deeply disappointed to see that out of the Governor’s policing bill, the only bits that have been run are the bits that give police additional protections from liability and the bits that increase penalties for protesters. What we haven’t seen was the one component that we actually supported—which was the ban on racial profiling,” Crow said.

 

by Isabella Murray
Posted 3/2/21

Iowa Starting Line is an independently owned progressive news outlet devoted to providing unique, insightful coverage on Iowa news and politics. We need reader support to continue operating — please donate here. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for more coverage.

3 Comments on "Iowa Legislature Takes Aim At Racial Justice Protests"

  • This is the email I sent to the Democrat on this committee: Senator Kevin Kinney
    DEAR SIR,
    I just read that you, the minority Democrat on the sub-Committee advanced the wide-ranging bill that gives more protections to law enforcement and clamps down on future Protests. Protesting is a protected right under the first amendment of each citizen. Why are you not protecting that? Why did you vote to let this Republican overreaching, wide-ranging bill out of committee? I know you could not stop the two majority senators, but just for principle why not vote in favor of the people? Is it because you are a former policeman? That is just awful that you think there was something wrong with the summer protests that were necessary because of policeman killing black citizens in the line of duty. People do not need the police in Iowa to have more rights than they already have.
    I am so disappointed that you voted against the platform ideas of Democrats. Do you think something was wrong with the protests this summer? I participated in three such protests in Cedar Rapids this summer without incident. In fact my police protected us from traffic. They worked with the protesting citizens to express their complaints about them. I would hope a Democrat former policeman would vote better than this. Why did you do this? What is your reasoning? Curious minds want and need to know, why? Do you really think that law enforcement needs extended protections?? Really? If this bill would pass; why do protestor, that are wrongly characterized as riots, now have to worry about getting sued by police?? Why do police need any more immunity? Haven’t they committed enough damage with impunity? Such as Killing citizens in daylight, with cameras filming; Busting down the wrong doors and killing innocent victims.
    If we can not count on our own Democrats to side with the people, Who should we count on? WIth Democrats like you, who needs enemies?
    With So Much Disappointment,
    Angela
    Iowa Voter
    P.S. Are you on Twitter? and If not, Why?? it is a political platform that I want to speak to elected officials on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*