Republicans are trying for a third year in a row to pass legislation that would limit how much the victims of crashes involving trucks from a trucking company could receive in financial compensation. The bill would limit non-economic damages (injuries) to $1 million, which one representative noted would be the only law of its kind in the US.
The bill, House Study Bill 114, was introduced Monday, and the House Judiciary Committee held their first public hearing on it Tuesday before two of the three representatives voted for it to advance.
Most who spoke at the morning meeting were those representing the trucking industry as well as business and insurance lobbyists in favor of the bill. The vast majority of lobbyists were also registered in support of it.
“Cost uncertainty due to nuclear verdicts creates unstable markets, it helps increase prices, and it lessens availability,” said Brittany Lumley with the Iowa Insurance Institute, adding the $1 million cap on non-economic damages would “help provide the certainty of lost costs to an industry that thrives on predictability and stability.”
“This simply becomes about whether or not Iowa’s gonna be open to do business in,” added Drew Klein with Americans for Prosperity.
The bill’s detractors, attorney groups representing Iowans involved in such crashes, said it would financially punish crash victims.
“Damage caps, or ‘tort reform,’ force a one-size-fits-all, government-mandated dollar value on human life,” said Andrew Mertens, deputy director for the Iowa Association of Justice, a member group of trial attorneys. “It’s immoral and unconstitutional.”
“It truly has some significant problems in the way it’s drafted,” added Jim Carney with the Iowa State Bar Association.
The bill would disallow courts from finding employers of truck drivers liable for “negligence in hiring, training, supervising or trusting” their employees.
That could have the effect of allowing “companies to take shortcuts on training or have drivers take risks, like spending too many hours on the road or driving through dangerous weather conditions,” according to a Bleeding Heartland article from last year’s bill.
It could also mean a commercial vehicle driver may be the only one who has to pay, not their employer.
If a jury can find a trucking company or driver guilty in a crash even within that narrow scope, the bill also limits “non-economic” damages (damages that can’t be quantified) to $1 million, “regardless of the number of claims … or defendants.”
Dan McKay with the Iowa State Bar Association said he hadn’t found any so-called “nuclear verdicts,” or jury awards that surpass $10 million, in Iowa. He also said Iowa’s insurance rates were “very competitive” to other states when it came to commercial vehicle liability.
“The bill seems to want to look at the fairness of this. And we have to talk about the fairness to those people (who) are injured or damaged by the negative acts of this carrier,” McKay said.
Rep. Sami Scheetz (D-Cedar Rapids), who voted against advancing the bill, noted that no other US state had a specific cap for the trucking industry. (Eleven states cap non-economic damages in general lawsuits.)
“For a long, long time in this state, we’ve been trusting our neighbors, our peers, to sit in a courtroom, listen to testimony, and make that decision” on what to award crash victims, Scheetz said. “But for some reason, there’s a sentiment running through the building this week that we should take that right away from Iowans.”
by Amie Rivers
If you enjoy stories like these, make sure to sign up for Iowa Starting Line’s main newsletter and/or our working class-focused Worker’s Almanac newsletter.
Have a story idea for me? Email firstname.lastname@example.org, or find me on Twitter, TikTok, Mastodon, Post, Instagram and Facebook.
Iowa Starting Line is part of an independent news network and focuses on how state and national decisions impact Iowans’ daily lives. We rely on your financial support to keep our stories free for all to read. Find ISL on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter.
3 Comments on "GOP Bill Shields Truck Companies If They Crash Into You"
This bill is utterly outrageous. Iowa may be red now, but that doesn’t mean it has to be crazy. Even the reddest states don’t have negligence-protection laws for the trucking industry like this.
And I’m not saying “outrageous” just because I lost a friend to a commercial trucker who didn’t bother to make sure his trailer coupling hadn’t rusted out. My friend had the misfortune to be driving on the interstate when that trailer went careening into his car. His awful death could happen to anyone. And if this bill passes and sends the signal that the trucking industry is protected from the consequences of negligence, the risk of it happening to other people will definitely go up.
Before any surgery you have to sign papers so you won’t sue them if they screw up.
Guess all of the training isn’t important when it comes to protecting lives.
Unfortunately, it seems our state is now being used to introduce outlandish, outrageous legislation. The first to land on the radar was the school voucher catastrophe. Now, every item on the wish list of those wishing to destroy public safety and responsibility is being addressed; I guess it’s the trucking industry’s turn.
The trucking industry since the pandemic hit has a record number of newbies piloting their trucks. It also has experienced explosive growth in the formation of new trucking companies. Combining these two phenomena, this legislation will only encourage recklessness.