GOP Curriculum Approval Law Would Cost Iowa Schools Tens Millions of Dollars

Screenshot from Iowa House subcommittee hearing

A proposed stringent approval system of every piece of material used in all Iowa public school classrooms could cost those schools, at minimum, about $27.4 million a year, according to one state agency.

The nonpartisan Iowa Legislative Services Agency (LSA) drafted the estimate based on SF 2369, the Iowa Senate’s version of Iowa House Study Bill 672.

The sibling bills include sweeping reforms on Iowa’s public education system. They also divert public funds toward private schools; however, the curriculum approval aspect of the bills siphon dollars directly from district funds.

According to the bills, educators would need to provide all their textbooks, books, articles, syllabi, website links, outlines, handouts, presentations, videos, and other educational materials for documentation, review, and approval twice a year. Anything used in student instruction would need to be published on the school district’s website by Aug. 23 and again by Jan. 15.

That standard would apply to each class in the school district and materials have to be sorted by subject area, grade level, and teacher. Also, the publishing dates fall around the start of the school year and the end of winter break, so teachers would have to create lesson plans months ahead of time for each class they teach. Many educators have said such a system would be simply unworkable and would impede a teacher’s ability to adjust their lessons to their students throughout the year.

The LSA report notes this measure would have no fiscal impact on the state, but would financially burden school districts.

“The requirement of this bill to make information sortable requires an interactive database, which may be beyond the current capabilities of school district software and systems,” the report states. “Additional administrative costs may be required to support the software and systems and support internal and external users. These costs cannot be estimated and would vary by school district.”

The LSA also noted it could cost additional money to post materials online in other languages—24 languages are spoken in the Storm Lake School District for example—but it can’t estimate those costs.

The $27.4 million estimate comes from the time it would take teachers to create months of lesson plans well in advance of when they would be utilized in the classroom. That amount could also cover the average salaries of 483 Iowa teachers, according to Iowa Department of Education data.

“School districts would need to provide classroom coverage for the time teachers would need to prepare materials for posting or add additional contract days for completion of the work,” the LSA report says. “If substitutes are used rather than additional contract days, the statewide cost to school districts is estimated to be $27.4 million.”

During a Tuesday Iowa House subcommittee hearing over the House version of the bill, Margaret Buckton, legislative analyst and executive director for the Urban Education Network, argued the LSA’s $27.4 million estimate was too low.

Buckton said the LSA’s report assumes schools are able to find enough subs to cover for full-time teachers over a five-day period.

“We don’t have substitutes,” she said. “We don’t have enough to take care of illness for teachers right now. From the Urban Education Network’s perspective, we believe we are going to have to add a full week to the teacher contracts to come back to school a week early to get this done.”

Buckton, whose organization represents Iowa’s 20 largest school districts, said the true cost is closer to $54 million because the LSA estimated the cost using “substitute time” and not “teacher time.” She said “substitute time” does not exist.

Buckston also said with this potential added expense, it is not the time to use public funds for the voucher-like student-first scholarship proposals attached to the bills.

“Hopefully, we don’t create so much more that teachers aren’t willing to return,” Buckton said. “We’re short teachers and don’t believe the state can afford to pay for the competing education system given that dynamic.”

 

by Ty Rushing
03/10/22

Iowa Starting Line is part of an independent news network and focuses on how state and national decisions impact Iowans’ daily lives. We rely on your financial support to keep our stories free for all to read. You can contribute to us here. Also follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

4 Comments on "GOP Curriculum Approval Law Would Cost Iowa Schools Tens Millions of Dollars"

  • Of course this law would be extremely expensive, not to mention a huge burden for teachers and a strong incentive for educators who can do so to leave Iowa and be welcomed by other states.

    I’m not a teacher, but some close relatives and friends are. I have some idea of the large amounts of effort they put into preparing for classes, and the time it takes. Just thinking about Iowa teachers having to deal with the consequences of this awful law is infuriating. As if teaching here isn’t hard enough already!

    It’s time for a new book called WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH IOWA? The book about Kansas came out in 2004, a year that seems like a different world. Iowa could be the update state. The book would not be cheering, but if it offered any good ideas for a way forward, it could be worth reading.

  • What a crock of crap! Let our teachers teach and quit trying to influence them and control their individual skills. This program inhibits their ability to adjust to the levels of their student’s. Furthermore, I don’t t want my taxpayer money paying for private schools!! Also, I implore you to stop attempting to create a new history of my country!! Slaves were here and prejudice existed. Get out your power reach!!

  • I was a student teacher during the Watergate investigation. It was a great time to be in social studies class. We read the news and discussed it. The students were interested!
    It would be the same today teaching about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Students will be interested in the news and the history behind it. But it would all be forbidden under this law because the invasion had not even started when the semester started.
    I can’t believe this bill is still getting serious consideration.

  • Yes everyone has a story about how someone they know is a teacher. My brother is also a teacher in the state of Iowa. He teaches special needs children with behavior problems. Ok now we can get to why this is happening. Parents would like teachers to teach about core curriculum objectives. Critical race theory and gender exploration are not, and should not be in that list. At what point did the state employee become a god that doesn’t answer to there customer. I work for a fortune 500 company and we answer to our customers everyday. And no I don’t get to express my opinion whenever I want to whoever I want. The parent is the customer and this is part of the reason school boards are being contested so vigorously. The more the teachers and unions push back the more people start to catch on there is ideology not education being pushed. I am a product of 1/2 public and 1/2 private education. I cant say one is a better product. I can guarantee you private is about 4 times as efficient with there funds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

*

*